Daily Thought - 2024-05-09
Hey, I'm Hanno! These are my daily thoughts on Crosscut, the programming language I'm creating. If you have any questions, comments, or feedback, please get in touch!
This thought was published before Crosscut was called Crosscut! If it refers to "Caterpillar", that is the old name, just so you know.
There's one thing prefix operators do, that postfix operators typically don't: clearly delimit which arguments belong to an operation, using parentheses. This is more verbose, but also more readable. If we had an IDE though, that shows us where arguments belong, we could re-gain that readability.
But there's one disadvantage to not having delimiters, that an IDE can't save us
from: It restricts how we can overload functions. Let's say we have a function
f
that takes an argument of type B
. We can't create an overloaded variant
that takes two arguments of type A
and B
without introducing ambiguity at
the call site.
So here's a thought experiment: What if functions can have only one argument
(which could be a tuple)? Then there would be a clear difference between a b f
(we need the B
variant) and ( a b ) f
(we need the A
and B
variant). The
more I think about that, the more I like it!
Hey, you! Want to subscribe to my daily thoughts? Just let me know (maybe include a nice message, if you're up for it), and I'll send you an email whenever I post a new one.